歡迎來到Mu！
歡迎來到Mu的社論首頁，這僅是針對未成年愛好者 (MAP) 提供支持與倡議所採取的一項大膽新策略的一部分！請使用導覽列瀏覽Mu的其他內容。本頁面彙整了Mu的集體立場聲明、新聞稿及相關新聞。我們另設有觀點和客座部落格。 歡迎使用Atom 1.0和RSS訂閱源。
The American mainstream Left, it seems, is experiencing a minor-crisis over the "pedophile" menace in these end-time days of Epstein.
We might ask on the one hand; are pedophiles something the Left should run away from like startled kids, or even deny, as per the drag-panic and groomer-libel we have all become far too familiar, and frankly bored to death with? Or is pedophilia a hysteria-de-jour they should instead continue to sow the seeds of, lest the pedo-smear one day become profitable as it now promises to be with the incoming release of the "Epstein Files"?
Commentators, naturally, appear not only to...
The Crime and Policing Bill represents the UK's most recent attempt to strengthen its omnipresent grasp over its unfortunate citizens, yet again using MAPs and children as pawns in a grotesque authoritarian game. In this article, we will take a look at what the government is planning to do and how MAPs may be able to hinder some of those efforts. We will refer to the bill itself, and the explanatory notes, as reviewed in March 2025. In order to keep the article length manageable, we will refer readers to technical guides and legal discussions on other resources where the relevant issues have already been covered to a high standard.
Extreme notification requirements
Numerous media outlets are reporting a plan by the UK government to pass laws against tools that can be used to make criminalized images of AI children. Accounts are somewhat vague and even contradictory on details. According to The Guardian, under the upcoming Crime and Policing Bill:
- "It will become illegal to possess, create or distribute AI tools designed to generate child sexual abuse material."
- "It will also become illegal for anyone to possess manuals that teach potential offenders how to use AI tools to either make abusive imagery or to help them abuse children." ...
The MAP term is these days derided on the one hand by conservatives as the epitome of 'woke', and by liberals on the other hand for 'glorifying/normalizing pedophilia'. To many across the entire political spectrum, MAP = pedophile = child rapist. The term was intended not to push any kind of sexual contact agenda, but to unify people attracted to children and teens while avoiding the stigma of the misused 'pedophile' and the many outrageous assumptions surrounding those to whom this term is applied. Pedophile is also a word used to describe a variety of phenomena which are not necessarily connected. Many people, when using this word, are not 'calling a spade a...
政治右派往往將MAP們（喜歡未成年人的人）視為涉及LGBTQ+權利的「文化戰爭」的下一階段。政治左派則常將MAP們視為4chan上的騙局，意在詆毀LGBTQ+群體。雙方都錯了，本文將說明原因。
今年五月，奧爾巴尼市議員Thomas Brough因聲稱「LGBTQ+」縮寫中的「+」號也包含戀童癖者而遭到斥責。他在市議會會議上深思熟慮地表示：「我鼓勵大家去了解何謂『minor-attracted persons』。」結果，Brough因此遭到Albany Pride等各LGBTQ+團體的嚴厲批評，這些團體聲稱此類關聯純屬捏造。在引發公憤後，他已被要求接受「敏感度培訓」。
現代的LGBTQ+團體當然有權表達自己的觀點，而且許多現代酷兒確實與MAP保持距離。然而，歷史告訴我們，他們否認與MAP之間存在任何聯繫是錯誤的。酷兒社群中一些最傑出的思想家其實是 MAP，或是對喜歡未成年持中立或積極的態度。同志權利運動之父Harry Hay曾堅決主張，應將那些倡導未成年愛好者群體權益的組織（例如NAMBLA）納入更廣泛的酷兒解放鬥爭之中。但這僅是MAP與同志群體之間眾多連結的其中一例，這類連結的數量之多，絕非可以忽視。
本文將探討同志權益運動與MAP之間的歷史，並試圖釐清「酷兒」一詞在當今...
Celebrity "pedophilia" is again making headlines this summer, causing considerable embarrassment and a sense of deja-vu for a public-broadcasting institution.
When the news first broke, the British public were apparently shocked to hear their 'national treasure', BBC bigwig, and royal reporter Huw Edwards apparently had some kind of interest in teenagers. Never mind that he had not been accused of sexual interaction with anyone under the local age of consent (16). Having any sexual interest in minors, under the age of 18, was itself a cardinal sin.
The star presente...
Mu is an organization that advocates for proper understanding and destigmatization of minor-attracted people (MAPs).
In an article published by The Guardian, IWF Chief Executive Susie Hargreaves claimed that "generative AI tools provide a playground for online predators to realise their most perverse and sickening fantasies."
There are a number of problems with the claims made in the article, most notably the labeling of MAPs who have never preyed on young people as 'predators', and calling their feelings 'perverse' and 'sickening'.
There are a significant number of men attracted to those under 18, and the vast majority of these men do not 'prey' on young people. T...